The equine community continually grapples with a crucial question: when does equine use cross the line into abuse? This topic took center stage at the 25th World Horse Welfare conference on November 10, where experts delved into the nuances of this complex issue and the areas that exist within the “shades of grey.”
Roly Owers, CEO of World Horse Welfare, highlighted how this question has been a focal point for the organization for nearly a century. “The discussion around this subject has evolved dramatically, resonating not only among the public but also across various segments of the horse world and academic circles,” he shared.
Owers outlined three primary factors driving this ongoing debate. The first revolves around the digital era, which has amplified awareness of animal welfare concerns, making the discussion more prevalent. Secondly, societal values are undergoing a transformation, elevating animal welfare as a key concern, resulting in skepticism toward traditional animal uses. Lastly, advancements in scientific research have significantly broadened our understanding of equine needs and the impact of human interactions on horses.
“Science is revolutionizing our understanding of what constitutes good horse welfare and the dynamics of a healthy horse-human relationship,” Owers asserted. “However, despite the love and conscientious care given to horses by their owners, these instances are often viewed as exceptions rather than the norm. The perception, for many, remains that horses are being utilized and mistreated.”
Owers pointed to certain consequences of this perception, citing instances like the removal of riding from modern pentathlon after distressing scenes in Tokyo and a BBC Panorama exposé on former racehorses. “The growing calls to ban racing and equestrian sports each year, along with voices labeling riding as abuse or unethical, pose a significant challenge,” he expressed. “Our mission is to advocate for a world where horses are employed but never exploited.”
During a panel discussion moderated by Sky Sports’ Nick Powell, experts weighed in on how the equine community can establish a consensus on the definition of use versus abuse. Bluebell Brown, a Royal Veterinary College PhD student, emphasized the importance of remaining open to new information and adjusting practices based on evolving scientific evidence to improve horse welfare.
Lee Mottershead from the Racing Post highlighted the value of ongoing discussions and debates, suggesting that progress toward better equine welfare arises from continuously questioning existing practices. He recounted the perspective of a leading trainer who raised concerns about certain procedures in racing that may compromise the breed’s strength.
Chief Veterinary Officer Christine Middlemiss stressed the need for consensus on desired outcomes while valuing diverse perspectives in these discussions. Sarah Coombs, a vet and World Horse Welfare trustee, underscored the necessity for a flexible approach, encouraging honest dialogues and a willingness to embrace change.
The consensus was clear: while some forms of abuse are unanimously recognized, challenges arise when questioning traditional practices. The experts emphasized the importance of adaptability, a proactive attitude, and open-mindedness to engage constructively with differing viewpoints for the collective betterment of equine welfare.
